BJP's Unique Definition of Corruption Under Modi

His definition of corruption may be good enough to beat the Congress with, but is not good enough for the people. The courts are bound to judge according to the law but we are free to judge corruption...

Prabhakar Sinha
हाइलाइट्स

His definition of corruption may be good enough to beat the Congress with, but is not good enough for the people. The courts are bound to judge according to the law, but we are free to judge corruption as corruption

His definition of corruption may be good enough to beat the Congress with, but is not good enough for the people. The courts are bound to judge according to the law, but we are free to judge corruption as corruption

PrabhaKar Sinha

Amit Shah has contended that the allegation of corruption against his son is baseless because the government is not involved in his deals. He has said, "This company (The Jaya's Temple Enterprises ) has not done any business even worth Re 1 with the goverment nor taken any government land or contract of even Re 1, nor done deals with anyone like in Bofors." (Telegraph 14.10.2017 .Patna .)

What he means is that if Modi or Amit Shah asks Adani or Ambani to give a few crore to a relation or a crony and also asks him to get orders for him worth 80 crore, it is no corruption because the government is not involved. It is true that it is not an easily provable corruption because Modi can take decisions or do things worth crores of rupees for them which may not be illegal. For example, Modi participated in Ambani's Jio launch. If Ambani  had invited Bachchan, he would have charged several crore. Surely, the participation of Modi was worth hundreds times more. A P.M. may take decisions, which may yield profit in hundress or thousands of crore to a businessman. Just because the transaction does not involve the POWER OF THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALLY, it does not become CLEAN.

Jay Shah's company was incorporated in 2004. Nobody either lent him any money to do business nor anybody gave him any orders. He made losses till 2013 and 2014. When Modi came to power in 2014, he made a profit of a little over Rs 18000.00, but suddenly in 2016, he got an unsecured loan of several crore and an avalanche of  orders with which the turnover of his company rose to Rs 80 crore. And the company was then suddenly and mysteriously closed.

Why did not  this miracle happen for years since 2004 when the company was incorporated ? Why did the miracle had to wait till Modi's becoming P.. and Amit Shah his twin in power ?

His definition of corruption may be good enough to beat the Congress with , but is not good enough for the people.The courts are bound to judge according to the law, but we are free to judge corruption as corruption even if the politicians' definition makes it a clean act.

To us, the funny coat worth a million, which Modi donned and strutted in when President Obama was here was corruption, because it was not given to the Sangh Pracharak Modi, but to P.M. Modi. And there are no free lunches. 

हस्तक्षेप से जुड़े अन्य अपडेट लगातार हासिल करने के लिए हमें
facebook फेसबुक पर फॉलो करे.
और
facebook ट्विटर पर फॉलो करे.
"हस्तक्षेप"पाठकों-मित्रों के सहयोग से संचालित होता है। छोटी सी राशि से हस्तक्षेप के संचालन में योगदान दें।