Hindu Rashtra : a Grave Theatre to Peace & our Democracy

LET NO ONE COMMIT THE MISTAKE OF THINKING THAT RAM RAJ MEANS A RULE OF THE HINDUS. MY RAM IS ANOTHER NAME FOR KHUDA OR GOD...

Prabhakar Sinha

Prabhakar Sinha

M.S.Golwarkar, the second Sar Sangh Sanchalak and the ldeologue of the RSS has written in his book We or Our Nationhood Defined (1938) as cited below :

"*Germany. .has shown how well nigh impossible it is for races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole , a good lesson for us in  Hindusthan to learn and profit by. ...

The foreign races in Hindusthan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to respect and hold in reverence Hindu religion, and must entertain no idea but those of the glorification of the Hindu race and culture i.e.of the Hindu Nation and must lose their separate existence to merge into the Hindu race, or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment- not even citizens' rights. "

1*.First, he admires Hitler, who disowned 25 lac German citizens of Jewish origin and finally killed them because they were a different race and could not be assimilated with the white Germans. Golwarkar prescribes the same treatment to the Muslims and Christians , who are called’foreign races'by him ( he does not prescribe mass killing of the Muslims and Christians though. In 1938, the mass killing in the concentration camps had not taken place ).

2.He demands that the Muslims and Christians MUST LOSE THEIR SEPARATE EXISTENCE TO MERGE INTO THE HINDU RACE.

3.If they do not comply they may’stay wholly subordinated to the Hindu nation’.

4.'Claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less preferential treatment - not even citizens' rights.

5.Golwarkar does not consider them Indians and asserts that they belong to’foreign races.'

Indian Muslims and Christians are racially the same as the Indian Hindus. The change of religion cannot change our race. In fact, the inhabitants of the Noth East or the dark skinned Adiwasis of India are racially different from Golwarkar and the others non -Adiwasis.

His calling them foreigners is without any basis and is divisive and destructive of the National Integration.

6.He wrote this in 1938. With such hatred for the Muslims and Christians poisoning the political atmosphere prior to independence, could any Muslims choose to remain in India ? Jinnah and RSS were on the same page both asserting that Hindus and Muslims were two' nationalities (for Jinnah ) and’two races’(for Golwarkar ) to live in ONE NATION AS EQUAL CITIZENS. Hence, partition of India was Jinnah's solution and complete subordination and merger into the Hindu race of the Muslims was that of Golwarkar's

7.Had there been no RSS and Hindu Maha Sabha, India might not have been partitioned.

8.The RSS-BJP are pursuing Golwarkar's unfinished agenda using Hindu Rashtra and’Hindutwa as a smokescreen to conceal their dangerous agenda with the potential to destroy India.

GANDHIJI'S RAM RAJ

Gandhiji spoke of Ram Raj in India. He chose the expression Ram raj to touch the hearts of the millions of Indians who were not literate and could not understand sophistiscated jargon of politics, However, his Ram raj was the very opposite of the divisive and destructive notion of Golwarkar and the others who were almost on the same page as the Muslim League and Jinnah. Jinnah claimed that the Hindus and Muslims were two nations and could not live in one India and wanted India partitioned. Golwarkar, on the other hand, claimed that the Muslims and Christians were foreigners and had no right on India and could only be tolerated as a second class citizens. Gandhiji made his idea of Ram raj clear in the following words :

LET NO ONE COMMIT THE MISTAKE OF THINKING THAT RAM RAJ MEANS A RULE OF THE HINDUS. MY RAM IS ANOTHER NAME FOR KHUDA OR GOD. I WANT KHUDAI RAJ, WHICH IS THE SAME THING AS THE KINGDOM OF GOD ON EARTH (The Harijan 26 February,1947 ).

For Gandhiji, all those born in India who had no other country had equal right on India regardless of their religion or blood. He expressed his view clear in The Harijan of 9 August,1942 in the following words :

HINDUSTAN BELONGS TO ALL THOSE WHO ARE BORN AND BRED HERE AND WHO HAVE NO OTHER COUNTRY TO LOOK TO. THEREFORE, IT BELONGS TO PERSIST, THE ISRAELIS, TO INDIAN CHRISTIANS, MUSLIMS AND OTHER NON-HINDUS AS MUCH AS TO HINDUS. FREE INDIA WILL BE NO HINDU RAJ : IT WILL BE INDIAN RAJ NASED NOT ON THE MAJORITY OF ANY RELIGIOUS SECT OR COMMUNITY, BJP ON THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE WHOLE PEOPLE WITHOUT DISTINCTION OF RELIGION.

While Golwarkar and the Hindu zealots wanted an India as a carbon copy of Pakistan in which the minorities would be merely tolerated as second class citizens, Gandhiji fought for an India in which all Indians had the right to live with equal rights and dignity,

SO, THE VOTARIES OF HINDU RAJ HATED HIM AND HAD HIM ASSASSINATED

हस्तक्षेप से जुड़े अन्य अपडेट लगातार हासिल करने के लिए हमें
facebook फेसबुक पर फॉलो करे.
और
facebook ट्विटर पर फॉलो करे.
"हस्तक्षेप"पाठकों-मित्रों के सहयोग से संचालित होता है। छोटी सी राशि से हस्तक्षेप के संचालन में योगदान दें।
hastakshep
>