Sonia is therefore a foreigner, while the Mughals were Indians

The Mughals, though initially foreigners, later became Indianized, India prospered under Mughal rule, and the Mughals never took away wealth from India abroad....

Justice Markandey Katju

Justice Markandey Katju

The Mughals and Sonia Gandhi

I regard the Mughals as Indians and Sonia Gandhi as a foreigner. Why ? Because the Mughals, though initially foreigners, later became Indianized, India prospered under Mughal rule, and the Mughals never took away wealth from India abroad.

On the other hand, though Sonia Gandhi repeatedly claims to be Indian, she cannot be regarded as such because she has taken away a huge amount of wealth from India, and stacked it in foreign banks and secret foreign havens.

What is the proof of this ? As yet there is no direct evidence, but there is overwhelming circumstantial evidence. There were scams after scams during UPA rule, when Sonia was the real ruler, while Manmohan Singh was only a puppet. Lacs of crores of rupees were looted in these scams ? Where did all this money go ? Maybe 5 percent or so may have gone to Suresh Kalmadi ( in CWG scam ), A.Raja ( in 2G scam ), and to someone else in the coal block scam. But these were small fries compared to Sonia in the UPA rule.

Putting two and two together, it is obvious that the bulk of the loot must have been taken by that arrogant lady who regarded herself as the Empress of India.

I regard even a foreigner as an Indian if he benefits India, and does not loot it.

But Sonia is like the British rulers, who looted huge amounts of Indian wealth and took it abroad, and unlike the Mughals who did not. Sonia is therefore a foreigner, while the Mughals were Indians.

(copied from Justice Katju’s Facebook page)

हस्तक्षेप से जुड़े अन्य अपडेट लगातार हासिल करने के लिए हमें
facebook फेसबुक पर फॉलो करे.
और
facebook ट्विटर पर फॉलो करे.
"हस्तक्षेप"पाठकों-मित्रों के सहयोग से संचालित होता है। छोटी सी राशि से हस्तक्षेप के संचालन में योगदान दें।