अनीता एम देसाई का मेल
निम्नांकित मेल मुझे मेरे एक लेख की प्रतिक्रिया में मिला है। अनीता एम देसाई कौन हैं, यह मुझे नहीं पता। इस मेल में वायरस के बारे प्रचारित कई तथ्यों पर सवाल उठाए गए हैं। हालांकि ये बातें पहले भी कुछ लोगों ने कहीं हैं, लेकिन देसाई जी ने इसे इस मेल में अधिक विस्तार और विभिन्न प्रमाणों समेत इसे रखा है।
चूंकि इस संबंध में मेरी जानकारी सीमित है, इसलिए मेल में दिए गए तथ्यों के बारे में मेरा कोई मत नहीं है। किन्तु, यह तो अब स्पष्ट ही है कि कथित वायरस का इस्तेमाल कुछ वैश्विक ताकतें दुनिया को अपनी मुठ्ठी में करने के लिए कर रही हैं। यह जाल और खेल बहुत बड़ा है, जिसमें मानव मानोविज्ञान के अध्ययन, और इंटरनेट प्लेटफार्मों से लेकर बनाए गए विशाल काय आंकड़ा – बैंक का उपयोग किया जा रहा है।
नीचे अनीता एम देसाई का ईमेल और अपना वह लेख (http://aldeilis.net/english/covid-19-and-it-monsters-new-trap-new-hunters/) दे रहा हूं, जिसकी प्रतिक्रिया में उन्होंने यह लंबा मेल मुझे लिखा है। दोनों सामग्री लंबी है, लेकिन मुझे लगता है कि आपको पढ़नी चाहिए।
– प्रमोद रंजन
Anita M. Desai <[email protected]>
In response “COVID 19 and IT monsters: New trap, new hunters by Dr. Pramod Ranjan”
Dear Mr. Ranjan,
The IT behemoths, like the mainstream media and even alternative media (like The Wire, Scroll and Quint) have mostly bended backwards from the pressure of the global controllers behind the covid hoax.
We can easily get calm over ‘sars-cov-2‘ by going beyond the fear-mongering by unscrupulous persons-controlled agencies and organisations.
The supposed new coronavirus 19 has not yet been proven to exist by way of thorough scientific standards of authentic purification and isolation.
Firstly, viruses are not living organisms or living microbes. They do not have a respiratory system, nor do they have a nucleus or digestive system.
Viruses are not alive and viruses are not contagious. The fear behind coronavirusis is wholly unwarranted.
It is high time we properly understand viruses and bacteria. You have been lied to.
No real footage of viral activity exists (except for a recently released (2018) short footage of an HIV virus which shows merely 20% of the virus theory process). Such footage is merely 3D animation and models.
Scientific Encyclopedia states viruses have been obtained for experimentation by means of extremely powerful centrifuges which must be specially built. Viruses are so small that they average around 0.1 microns in size for a typical virus.
Viruses are observed in cell cultures/petri-dish environments. Cell cultures are grown in controlled conditions outside their natural environment, wherein cells are artificially kept alive by fluids that are toxic and do damage to cellular activity.
In such a sterile environment, cells cannot utilize the full range of their normal cleansing methods as they would in the human body.
The human body offers these vital processes:
Phagocytosis (and all of its processes)
In the processes of phagocytosis, cellular debris and dead and dying tissue are absorbed and discarded for elimination out of the body.
It is bacteria that first and foremost carry out this process in large part—mainly as scavengers. Fungus and parasites are called upon as needed in special cases, and in this process, small amounts of viruses may be utilized to accompany all other processes.
All of these processes are alive, but viruses are not alive.
In such an artificial environment wherein cells are kept alive but not healthy by serums, cells will degenerate, and their viral janitors will become prominent.
Viruses do not multiply on their own. When added to fertile petri-dishes that sustain cellular life, no additional viral protein structures appear. Only when cells are added is there multiplication of viral protein structures. However, this is because petri-dishes are not the proper or healthy environment for cells, and so viral waste occurs.
This is because cells must manufacture viruses to cleanse themselves in such a toxic environment since they do not have access to the full range of their cleansing processes as would occur in the body.
Viruses are necessary to dissolve dead and dying tissue when tissue is so toxic that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate those tissues, waste, and cellular debris without being poisoned to death.
As stated, viruses may accompany these processes in small amounts. However, viruses will only become prominent when all these other processes have been largely killed due to:
Poor air quality
Poor water quality
Poor food quality
Wrong combination or choice of foods
Medical treatment, such as antibiotics and medications
When a body has a high degree of toxicity, bacteria feeding upon that toxic dead matter and tissue will be poisoned to death. When the body is at such a point of systemic toxicity, where bacterial levels and all living microbes in the body have been diminished or killed due to the above reasons, the body will call upon the help of viruses to help cleanse itself.
When the body cannot utilize milder methods, such as a cold (usually bacterial), it will utilize the help of non-living protein solvents which are known as viruses. Viruses help consume and eliminate substances into small particles that can then be expelled via mucous membranes, out through the skin, or through the intestinal tract.
Cells produce viruses when their tissues are so toxic that phagocytes, parasites, bacteria, and fungi cannot help cleanse, repair and regenerate their tissues and fluids. Science states, incorrectly without proof, that viruses originate outside the body, then ‘hijack’ the RNA or DNA of the cell, and then replicate whilst attacking cells indiscriminately.
If this were true, viruses would replicate endlessly, eventually attacking all healthy cells, but they do not. We know that antibodies, a type of white blood cell, regulates the virus. There exists no video evidence of viruses hijacking cells, except for 3D renders, and animations based on theory.
Science falsely claims that viruses replicate themselves. In reality, it is the cell itself that is producing the virus. Notice how viruses are manufactured by a healthy cell but do not destroy it.
RNA and/or DNA is given by the host cell to dissolve specific substances within the body. If this were not the case, the virus would destroy the cell which created it, but it does not. The virus is ejected, damaging part of the cell, but not destroying it completely. The cell is then able to repair itself in time.
Cells conspire as one unit to cleanse themselves and their surroundings so that new cellular activity can thrive. Large amounts of viral activity are present when the body is unable to use milder living microbial detoxification methods to cleanse itself due to systemic toxicity of tissues that poison living microbes.
As stated, when the normal janitorial functions of the body have been largely diminished and killed due to systemic toxicity, cells can no longer maintain themselves. Red blood cells come together as a whole unit to save themselves and conspire to cleanse themselves by manufacturing solvent protein constructs (virus) that disassemble and break down dead and dying cells, cellular waste, tissue, and foreign debris.
Cells manufacture viruses in their whole form cellularly. In this process, viruses are manufactured directly within the cell using pre-existing viral protein in the cell and genome, and are embedded/encoded with RNA and/or DNA by the host cell.
The cell ejects the virus, which is then regulated by white blood cells through that encoding (antibodies), which oversee the processes of the virus. This allows the viral activity to be controlled and regulated properly.
These two functions are united as one process, and they do not act separately. Once the cell ejects this virus, the cell is partially damaged but is not destroyed. The viruses, which are many, consume and dissolve dead, dying and foreign tissue, debris, unhealthy cells, and cellular waste.
This process takes time depending on the toxicity involved. The effects of their elimination are the symptoms experienced in cold or flu. Viruses break these substances down into tiny particles that can then be expelled via mucous, skin, and bowels.
When the process is complete, the body becomes stronger, so long as that person does not continue to toxify his or her body further. If he or she does, such extreme detoxifications will always occur.
Viruses cannot enter through the skin or eyes. Such vectors do not work because the mucus membranes and the immune system discard small amounts of foreign proteins such as viruses.
Viruses cannot enter through wounds because we bleed outwardly, not inwardly. Viruses do not ‘exist’ outside of petri-dish solutions or a living body. Viruses cannot function without a host cell that manufactures them and encodes them, and viruses cannot replicate without a host cell.
Viruses do not ‘infect’ or ‘invade’ cells. They are not alive to do so in the first place. Viruses’ primary function is to dissolve dead matter.
Cells produce different viral strains depending on the condition of the tissue involved. There are 320,000 viral strains inherent to the human body, and each cell contains the viral protein makeup to manufacture each strain when the body calls for it.
Viruses are sequenced/encoded by blood cells via RNA/DNA to break down specific dead and dying tissue and waste. Viruses are very specific protein structures.
Coughing, sneezing, and spitting is not a vector for the transmission of viruses. Saliva and mucus membranes break down any such particles. Skin is not a vector either because viruses cannot cross dead skin layers.
Viruses are a result of internal toxicity caused by the environment.
The only way to get a virus outside of natural means is via direct injection (vaccine) or blood transfusions of a patient who has a virus. However, in such cases, the body only analyzes it as foreign tissue that must be eliminated.
Since the virus did not originate within the bodily host, that body does not know the time and place that the virus will be active nor does it have the key to decode it (RNA or DNA encoded by the cell) and cannot find the time of its activity.
As such, it is analyzed as a foreign substance that must be eliminated. Protein solvents (viruses) are manufactured of varying strengths to discard this waste if living microbes cannot eliminate it.
Throughout the year, upon season and climatic/temperature changes, the body will dump mass amounts of toxins into the blood for removal. Some of these toxins are so toxic in nature, such as mercury, formaldehyde, and other chemical byproducts, that living microbes cannot feed upon and eliminate them without dying.
Non-living proteins are then manufactured by each cell in the corresponding location of the body where this cleansing is necessary. Those toxic substances are disassembled and broken down by viruses so that the body can eliminate them, restoring homeostasis.
The only way viruses can be used as biological weapons is via a vaccine injection, period. However, man-made substances that are injected can be designed to provoke extreme reactions in humans via various levels of tissue sterilization and adjuvants.
Viruses cannot cross-species ie; from animal to mankind. It is impossible for humans to develop animal flus—A. Because viruses are not contagious, and, B. Because animal RNA/DNA is not compatible with human RNA/DNA.
The only way animal tissue can be observed in the blood is through injection of animal tissues through vaccine injections, which make their way to the blood, bypassing the digestive tract. Only then will swine tissue, or bird tissue, or any such animal tissue appear in the body.
Coronavirus is a respiratory virus manufactured by cells in the lungs and respiratory areas to cleanse themselves of systemic toxicity. Such a cold virus occurs and functions in the following way:
Chemically toxic substances from the air are breathed into the lungs and respiratory system
Toxic particles land onto the surface of the lungs and the fluid-filled sacs in the lungs (alveoli) where they cannot be dislodged or dissolved by living microbes because of their toxicity and nature
Specific non-living protein solvent structures (virus) are then manufactured by cells in the respiratory system to disassemble and break down these substances in the lungs
Mild flu-like symptoms usually result, including coughing and fever, which initiates the cleansing and healing process.
Coughing brings blood and nutrients to the respiratory system. The symptoms associated with their removal are what occurs during SARS. Such airborne toxic substances are caused by burning plastics, formaldehyde, and factory tainted air, which encompasses a wide array of very toxic byproducts.
Older individuals with already weakened immune systems are prone to more advanced respiratory virus detoxifications and will account for most deaths. This illness may crop up in millions due to dense populations like in China breathing in such air on a daily basis. This does not mean it is contagious—it’s not.
There is no other explanation for how the human body maintains itself. It is the only logical answer. The truth has been hidden by science for almost 200 years, yet was revealed long ago in the 1800s by scientists such as Antoine Béchamp, who documented in his own experiments that viruses are terrain dependent, non-living agents that break down waste matter, that they come from within, not from without.
Viruses are nothing more than proteins that cleanse. The same is true about cancer. Cancer is another way the body tries to heal itself, by cocooning dead cells in a tumor in which the body is incapable of removing properly so that it can dissolve and cleanse those cells from the body at a later time. The body is miraculous and finds ways to heal no matter the circumstances. It has ways of short-circuiting and short-cutting pathways in times of trouble.
It is sad that modern science has led so many astray in their thinking with regard to their own bodies and how it functions creating nothing but fear and panic, whilst reaping massive amounts of money for those in power as a result. Such fear places a distrust in our own bodies, our neighbors and nature itself, making it appear as if we are powerless in the face of disease; that it is beyond our control and only the medical establishment can save us from ourselves.
How might those in power benefit from such chaos? Explore that thought. This confusion has led to the coronavirus ‘outbreak’ and the resulting fear and chaos which surrounds this manufactured and blown out of proportion event.
This virus is obviously being used to institute police state style laws and measures around the world and these will only increase if the majority do not wake up to the lies surrounding the nature of viruses and disease.
“Do you remember the pandemic of 2003, Coronavirus SARS COV-1? 2003 seems far away,… according to the WHO and CDC, we were in the middle of a novel Coronavirus SARS COV-1 or COVID 03 pandemic, but nobody was wearing a mask or observing social distancing. The police couldn’t have cared less….”
“The media was full of reports of the toppling of Saddam Hussein and the bombing of Iraq, but the screens never flashed with the numbers of new COVID 03 cases or an alarming mortality rate.”
“In 2009 we had another pandemic that we weren’t aware of, this time the culprit was the H1N1 influenza virus or swine flu. This pandemic is important because it was the year when the World Health Organization relaxed the criteria for declaring a level 6 pandemic, deleting the “severity of illness” requirement. Since then, it has been easier to declare a global pandemic, the severity of symptoms, and the mortality rate don’t matter anymore. This has been a boon for the pharmaceutical companies, who thanks to the WHO’s new guidelines, can make greater profits by selling more vaccines and drugs to governments than on a normal year.”
“With this precedent of pandemics in the 21st century in mind, we forward the clock to 2020 when the WHO declared an Emergency of International concern on January 30th, baptized the supposed novel virus Coronavirus SARS COV-2, or COVID 19, and declared a pandemic on March 12. The naming of the virus implies that the 2019 one is the follower of the 2003 virus and they both produce SARS or Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.”
“Since these two viruses are related, COVID 03 is useful to put COVID 19 in context. In 2003 the WHO declared the pandemic asserting there was a novel Coronavirus responsible for a new disease called SARS. To elucidate the truth in this assertion it is useful to put all respiratory illnesses in context and understand a bit about the virus. Though we usually don’t hear much about these viruses, they nevertheless appear every year during the flu season and form part of the yearly cocktail. According to the epidemiology lab at Health Protection Scotland in Glasgow, coronaviruses conform 5 to 15% of the viral mix, causing respiratory illnesses in the winter months, mostly in the spring. It is an RNA virus, just like the flu, which means it is quite unstable. It also, just like the flu, spreads from person to person in an aerosolized fashion.”
“According to the CDC and the WHO, the onset of the SARS COVID 1 and 2 is characterized by cold-like symptoms that include upper and lower respiratory problems, the same as for Influenza, pneumonia, or bronchitis. Once you get a fever, it is no longer a cold and if the symptoms remain in the nose, throat, and lungs it can be influenza. But once the symptoms are limited to the lungs, it can be pneumonia or any of the respiratory infections caused by a myriad of viruses, bacteria, fungi, and, according to the WHO, the novel SARS. The symptoms of pneumonia and other respiratory infection are quite similar and when the respiratory trouble becomes severe, patients can develop ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome).”
“What is very strange is that the symptoms corresponding to ARDS until 2003 were suddenly changed to SARS by the WHO for the COVID 03 pandemic. If we compare the symptoms of ARDS and SARS, they are almost identical; they cause high mortality in the elderly, critically or chronically ill. They both cause shortness of breath, cough, fever, and aches. In your lungs, they produce fluid build-up in the alveoli making the patient feel as though they don’t have enough oxygen. If very severe, the conditions can deprive the organs of oxygen and some patients may need ventilators. The survivors often present scarring of the lungs and difficulty breathing,”
“If these two diseases have very similar symptoms and results, why did the WHO call it a ‘novel’ disease produced by a ‘new’ Coronavirus in 2003? A July 16th, 2003 article on the JAMA network, a set of journals published by the American Medical Association, titled “Is SARS just ARDS?” explains how there is no difference whatsoever. The article describes the case of a woman who arrived at a hospital with cold and bronchitis symptoms, was sent home, but a few days later returned with high respiratory distress or ARDS symptoms. The doctors labeled the disease as ARDS as they had always done, but were surprised when they were told that it had to be labeled instead as a new disease, SARS. The only difference was that the woman had been to Hong Kong a few weeks before.”
“If two diseases have similar symptoms and outcomes, they are the same disease. The only difference here is a change in acronyms from ARDS to SARS and the addition of the label ‘novel’. The WHO called it a novel disease in 2003 and declared a pandemic, but the response to this first Coronavirus was very different: extensive testing was discouraged, arguing that it was only needed in clinical settings in the few countries affected (Guangdong, China, Korea and Hong Kong); travel restrictions to these areas were imposed as were the quarantine of patients for 10 days, plus the common sense hygiene rules like washing hands and covering your nose and mouth while sneezing or coughing.”
“The most evident difference is the fear campaign that we have been bombarded with, the mind-numbing repetition of frightening pictures, videos, and articles that accompanied COV-2, but were completely absent during COV-1. The difference in the number of cases reflects the WHO’s difference of policy (very limited testing in 2003), but the difference in mortality betrays another big problem with the logic of the narrative related to both viruses, SARS COV-1 and COV-2.”
“This narrative breaks down not only when we find that SARS is not a new illness, but when we question the truthfulness of their assertions about the virus. If COVID 19 is a new Coronavirus, the standard epidemiological procedure requires that the virus be isolated and purified. Purification of the virus means it must be separated from all other pathogens so that it can then be re-injected in a host to prove it produces the disease associated with it. If you don’t have the purified virus, you can’t prove with any certainty that it is that virus that causes the illness, the culprits could be many other pathogens.”
“The standard postulates for proving the existence of a novel pathogen were developed by 19th-Century German epidemiologist Robert Koch. His four postulates have changed over time and they were revised by epidemiologist T.M. Rivers in 1937. I will use Koch’s postulates as a base to test the status quo assertions and add comments or additions by Rivers when needed.”
“1. Pathogens must exist in all organisms with the disease, but not in healthy organisms.”
“a. To prove this, first, you have to establish a set of well-defined symptoms for the disease that would distinguish this virus from the rest. In this case, this is impossible, since the symptoms coincide with many other respiratory seasonal illnesses caused by both bacteria and viruses that can all evolve into the most severe cases of ARDS or SARS.”
“b. Rivers changed this postulate to only require that the pathogen is not present in healthy people. As the media has reported widely, almost 80% of the positive cases in 2020 are asymptomatic, especially among the young and healthy. As for the outbreak in 2003, it is difficult to prove, since very few people were tested; still, the mortality was so low, it is evident that if there was a new virus responsible, most people were asymptomatic too.”
“c. In conclusion, Koch and River’s postulate 1 was not met for COVID 1 or 2.”
“2. Pathogen can be isolated in the organism and grown in pure culture.”
“a. The correct procedure for the isolation and purification of a virus is as follows:..”
“b. The successful isolation of the pathogen is the basis for creating a golden standard that can then be used to develop tests for it. Without this golden standard, you can’t prove the relation of the virus to any specific disease, and any test developed will be quite meaningless. Without a reliable test, the case number also becomes senseless.”
“c. Unfortunately, there was no isolation of COV-1 nor COV-2 that has followed the correct procedure as outlined in the graphic above. Instead, all the claims for a new virus are based on the PCR (Polymerase chain reaction), procedure invented by Kary Mullen in 1983. The PCR probe was designed as a manufacturing technique to amplify DNA and RNA sequences, but not to detect viruses, according to its inventor. Regrettably, in this new fashion in epidemiology, the PCR probe is used not just to find the supposed gold standard for the virus, but also as the test for COVID 1 and 2. Needless to say, it is not scientifically sound to use the same PCR probe as both gold standard and test.”
“d. The following PCR procedure was used by most papers to prove the existence of COV-1 and COV-2 and is outlined below:..”
“e. Continuing with the second part of point 2 of Koch postulates, the purified pathogen, should then be grown in pure culture. Viruses can’t be cultured because they are technically not alive; they can’t reproduce by themselves nor manufacture their proteins. Instead, they have to be introduced into a living host to see if it grows. I will outline here some of the key papers used to declare SARS COVID 1 or COVID 03 a new virus and link it to a new SARS. All the researchers used the PCR method outlined above:”
“f. In sum, the above papers and many others were used as the basis to prove the existence of a Coronavirus that produced SARS in 2003, though they couldn’t even find the virus; only bacteria, other viruses, and RNA sequences that could not even approximately be compared to a Coronavirus. Koch’s postulate 2 was not proven. The papers for COV-2 will come later.”
“3. Cultivated pathogen should cause disease when reintroduced into a healthy organism.”
“a. The lack of the successful isolation and purification of a Coronavirus related to SARS precludes any possibility of proving this postulate. It is impossible to link a disease to a non-purified virus, the symptoms could be the result of other viruses or bacteria.”
“b. A Nature paper called “Koch’s Postulates Fulfilled for SARS Virus”, published on May 15, 2003, claimed it on the title but didn’t provide proof in the article. They followed the PCR probe method, which means they didn’t isolate the real virus, just some RNA. The RNA was then reintroduced into two monkeys, one had mild respiratory symptoms, and the other one had a rash on his skin and different lung pathology; neither had SARS.”
“4. The pathogen must be re-isolated from the inoculated host and identified as identical to the original.”
“a. Another postulate impossible to prove if you haven’t isolated the real virus.”
“b. The PCR probe used is very sensitive and can find a great variety of DNA and RNA strands, but can’t determine where they came from. The test must be calibrated with a preconceived idea, in this case, an RNA virus since the researches thought it was a Coronavirus. Without the real virus, there is no gold standard virus to compare to.”
“c. This is why many countries have experienced wild differences in testing results. For example, Singapore tested 18 patients daily for a week, sometimes even many times during the same day. predictably, the test results varied from positive to negative and back within even the same day.”
“5. Proof of Filterability:”
“This is an extra postulate created by Rivers that Koch didn’t include. None of the papers above were able to prove filterability, which means that you can use a sieve to purify the sample and ease the identification of a possible pathogen.”
“6. Detection of a specific response to the virus:”
“The last of River’s postulates that could not be fulfilled either. Once again, without the purified virus, any response can’t be attributed to just one virus.”
“Though the above papers and many others more have claimed to have fulfilled Koch and Rivers postulates for Coronavirus SARS COV-2 in 2003, it is evident that it remains just a claim in the title of the article, not a proven fact in the article itself. These claims have been used to set a credible basis for COVID 19, but if you look closely, they have no proof.”
“Coronavirus, SARS COV-2 COVID 19, the follower of SARS COV-1 COVID 03. The inability to purify and isolate the real virus in 2003 means the same for COV-2 since as we will see, the experts used the same PCR probes as for COV-1,with the same inconclusive results. In 2020, the WHO and CDC called SARS a new disease even though they had called it a new disease already in 2003.”
“I am going to dissect a little bit the present claims for COV-2, the follower of the one they couldn’t find. As we saw with COV-1, if you can’t purify the virus, you can’t prove Koch’s or Rivers’ postulates.”
“COVID 19 was reported first in Wuhan China at the end of 2019 and by 15 January 2020, Dr. Christopher Drosten from Charite Clinic in Berlin had the PCR test ready for this supposedly new virus. This expedient test was then used by the WHO as the standard for this pandemic. Dr. Drosten was one of the experts who was unable to isolate and purify COV-1 in 2003, finding instead only paramyxoviruses.”
“Dr. Drosten claimed he had followed the correct procedure for the test, meaning that he had isolated the virus, but when a group of epidemiologists sent him a letter asking if he had isolated and purified the virus to use as the golden standard for his test, he didn’t reply. He finally answered on June 18th, after being prodded into complying by Viviane Fischer, a lawyer hired by the scientists. His response was very predictable: No; once again, Dr. Drosten only had strands of RNA from the PCR probe that were construed as a possible coronavirus, responsible for this new SARS.”
“Below are some sample studies used by the world institutions to prove the existence of COV-2 and associate it with SARS…”
“The above papers plus many others boast about finding the COVID 19 virus that can be linked to SARS, but none proves the direct association. Kim’s paper (*Osange Public Health Journal of the Korea CDC) is the boldest. Kim claims a strong link between COVID 19 and SARS in the introduction but bases his assertions not on his findings, but on another paper that doesn’t prove it. Kim then concludes with an admission of a complete lack of causative proof, no link between the RNA he found and SARS.”
“I will dissect a bit more another important study that also claims to have isolated COVID 19. It was published by The Lancet on January 29th, 2020 and it was called: “Genomic characterization and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus implications for virus origins and receptor binding” by Roujian Lu, Xiang Zhao et al.”
“The samples of nine patients with pneumonia from Wuhan, China were put in cell culture and checked for cytopathic effects with a light microscope, meaning they looked to see if any virus had changed the structure of the cells. They then did the RNA amplification in the PCR probe and found RNA strands that they tried to study in an evolutionary and epidemiological way by comparing it with the samples of COV-1, MERS, and other respiratory viruses.”
“Though they don’t admit it, it is clear even from the title that they never isolated the virus using the correct method that I outlined above, so just like with COV-1, they didn’t have a gold standard to compare with their samples.”
“Their first conclusion stated that the 9 patients had very similar RNA strands and inferred that the RNA was the cause of their illness. As they pointed out themselves, the patients had pneumonia which can be caused by various viruses and bacteria so there was a high probability for finding very similar RNA strands among the samples. Pneumonia isn’t either a weird new disease that can be attributed to a new virus. In reality, they didn’t prove the existence of a new virus linked to any new illness.”
“In another conclusion, the authors claimed to have proof of COVID 19 as a new virus because it differed by 21% from COVID 03. As we proved above, COV-1 wasn’t isolated nor purified, so their comparison was limited to the RNA strands that experts found in patients from Guangzhou, China in 2003 to the RNA strands that the authors found in Wuhan China in 2020. This constitutes no proof of a new virus that causes a new disease. The authors spent a lot of time going around the issue and claiming a non-existent proof.”
“The papers claiming proof of COVID 19 as a new disease caused by a new virus all repeats the same procedure, without noticing the elephant in the room, nobody has purified the real virus. Some papers dare to claim success in the proof, the majority admit only finding a possible association, which isn’t the same as causation. The burden of proof is much higher for causation and most papers didn’t even do a good job at proving association, much less causation.”
“Choosing to associate certain strands of RNA to pneumonia and claiming it is a new virus and a new disease doesn’t constitute scientific proof. This is more evident when the WHO, CDC, and FDA correctly advise that a positive result of the COVID 19 test doesn’t rule out other viral or bacterial infections. The same institutions that have proclaimed this new virus accept that since the virus hasn’t been purified, the attribution of the symptoms to it remains elusive.”
“The graphic below shows four papers. among many, that claim the isolation of the virus and proof of its causative properties, but admit failure in the conclusions…”
“In conclusion, our search for a new virus that causes a novel disease has been fruitless. We only find papers claiming proof that they can’t back with their research. The mental and physical health of most people in the world has been affected, their economic prospects put in doubt, countries are burdened with debt, unemployment, and soaring poverty. All this disaster was caused by a fear campaign that transformed our fellow humans from providers of social contact and happiness to vectors of a misunderstood virus that hasn’t even been proven to exist.”
“People do die of respiratory infections every year; according to the Respiratory Infection Atlas published by the World Lung Foundation, acute respiratory infections caused by viruses like influenza, syncytial, paramyxoviruses, and coronaviruses cause the death of 4.25 million people every year. Many of those infections become severe enough for the patient to present ARDS or SARS and some end up dying.”
“The difference this year is the constant bombardment of images, articles, and reports about the deaths and cases, used to create fear. How many articles have been written claiming fluid in the alveoli and scarring of the lungs as completely new symptoms, of damages to blood cells and the brain that have not been proven? More than you could count. People have been frightened into thinking the lethal virus is everywhere, and even more frightening, it is aerosolized; images of deadly droplets from fellow humans at the beach, while jogging or even going to the restroom, as though this didn’t happen every year with the good old flu.”
“It is difficult to understand what is the purpose of this farce, all I know is that fear is a very bad advisor to the rational potential of the mind. We should question any institutional and governmental strategy that is based on fear.”
Anita M. Desai